08 / FAQ
Straight answers. No token theatre.
These answers distinguish the operational off-chain evidence stack and synthetic tests from the undeployed Solana value layer and token launch.
01 / Questions
What you should know before following the project.
01What is PactVerity in simple terms?
PactVerity is building a checkout and referee for AI software. Proof Engine v1 tests user-supplied service evidence against explicit rules, the public stateless Receipt API beta creates and verifies the same receipts, and the deterministic simulator runs synthetic scenarios. No checkout, escrow or settlement system is deployed.
02Is PactVerity live?
The Proof Engine v1, public Receipt API beta, deterministic simulator and fixed 50 million PVTY mainnet supply are live. No devnet or mainnet escrow, collateral, slashing or settlement program, production SDK, independent audit, public sale or customer activity is represented as live.
03Can I buy PVTY now?
No. The official fixed-supply mint is finalized, but no verified sale contract or purchase route is active. Any sale link claiming to be official today should be treated as unaffiliated.
04Why might the project use a token?
If the Solana protocol is built and approved for launch, PVTY is specified to act as provider eligibility stake and verifier stake—separate from a provider's stablecoin performance bond. That utility is planned, not deployed, and would not make PVTY the required currency for every service.
05What would buyers and providers fund?
The proposed model would use a stablecoin such as USDC for buyer service payments and a separate provider performance bond. Any available refund would be limited by the recorded terms and deployed assets. No such escrow or bond currently exists.
06Does PactVerity guarantee a refund?
No. Any refund would be limited to the assets and rules of the relevant escrow and provider bond. Smart-contract, verifier, stablecoin and network failures can still cause loss.
07What does the $25 million figure mean?
It is a deterministic synthetic stress scenario: 250,000 model agreements multiplied by $100 of nominal value, with four checks per agreement for 1,000,000 checks. It is not historical volume, TVL, revenue, customer funds, adoption or assets secured. Service and escrow volume is $0.
08What can the Proof Engine and Receipt API verify?
They deterministically check supplied latency, uptime, data freshness and optional SHA-256 output commitments. They recheck receipt structure, results, digest and an optional Solana-wallet signature. They do not independently measure a service or prove that supplied evidence is true.
09Is a PactVerity verifier the same as a Solana validator?
No. Solana validators secure the blockchain. Future PactVerity verifiers would assess service evidence under rules that are not yet deployed on-chain.
10Will PactVerity use x402?
Potentially for future agent-to-agent stablecoin payment transport. x402 does not itself provide escrow, quality checks, disputes, refunds or slashing, so those functions would require separate implementation and review.
11Will there be guaranteed returns or passive yield?
No. The project does not promise token appreciation, dividends, a price floor, liquidity or passive income. Any future rewards would need to relate to completed network work, not simply holding a token.
12Why is $0.01 only a reference?
No sale or active PVTY price exists. A future primary sale might quote a fixed PVTY-per-SOL rate equal to about $0.01 at a named launch snapshot, but its dollar equivalent would change whenever SOL moves. PVTY may also have no resale market or liquidity.